Introduction
Human Resources
is a key enabling function for any organization. You may call it a support
function or even a cost center. This means, that the function is not directly
contributing towards the revenue or profit for the organization but surely adds
to the overall running cost. Obviously, no organization will be foolish to
incur a cost without any returns coming from it. Most of the times, HR in an
organization is not valued as they are termed as very subjective function
without any objective measure. Hence, HR needs to create a system where some of
the key HR functions are able to show value addition to the entire
organization. The return may be tangible or intangible but a definite measure
will surely make the case stronger for HR to partner strategically with the
business and demonstrate their value and interventions.
Scorecard approach
Scorecard is
best way to show the progress over a period of time if the parameters are
correctly captured and measured. The scorecard for HR shall be strategically aligned
to business strategy. This means, that HR shall be supporting the vision an organization
has chartered for itself for the given period. However, we often make a mistake
of not aligning the two. The non congruence of business and HR scorecard causes
friction between the two functions and thus the required benefit of the
scorecard implementation is not reaped.
Any HR scorecard
at the time of development shall consider four major areas of impact
Financial impact: At the end of the day,
any function shall be able to give a considerable value to the organization,
either in terms of revenue or in terms of savings and it is going to be no
different for HR. some of the measures can be
- Revenue per employee which also reflects the correct skill identified for the job and hired
- Cost or percentage cost of employees underutilized
- Employee cost for pipeline projects
Value for customer: the HR processes
shall be able to deliver value to internal as well as external customers. The
HR interventions can mean some direct output for external customers if they see
- The organization has thought leaders who are respected in the competitive space
- People engaged in their project are competent and skilled
- They see their job going as per schedule and skillfully done
Development of people and retention: The scorecard shall measure the association people are having with the organization.
The association determines the productivity at the work. Frequent turnover of
teams or disengaged employee always causes loss of productivity. Some of the
measures can be
- Intellectual property
- Proportion of people progressed internally
- Number of upward movement an employee sees during his tenure
- Average growth rate of an employee
- Tenure in organization
Efficiency of internal processes: The
internal processes shall always improve and facilitate the desirable outcome. From
a process standpoint, it can be considered effective if there is
- Quality assurance at every process
- The process is helping in reducing the number of transactions
- Reduction in turnaround time
- Compliance
Approach towards Scorecard: DMAIC and Pareto
While coming to
scorecard and it’s implementation, it is important to have a systematic quality
approach. DMAIC and Pareto principle put together can help in creating one
scorecard for the organization. There could be N variables while we are
creating the problem equation from an HR standpoint. We cannot approach all the
problems simultaneously. Without understanding the impact, reasons and the
measure of the problem area, any approach will be similar to shooting in the
dark. To have a proper solution, we need to go for the most systematic process.
Pareto principle gives us the most impactful problem area(s) and DMAIC gives a
definite measure and steps to improve.
The first step
is to make a complete laundry list of problem areas in purview of HR with their respective
reasons and impacts. Problem can be in areas of talent acquisition, talent
development, talent engagement or the process part. Within every area, there
can be different sub areas to improve. For instance, talent acquisition may
have problems in sourcing effectiveness, sourcing channel, turnaround time or
candidate experience. Similarly, the talent development can have problems areas
as identification of competency at each level, required training skills in
organization, succession planning etc. Hence it is important to make complete
list of areas that can be worked upon.
Define: Out of
the laundry list, it is important to segregate the problem areas which are
impactful. Not every step of process can be worked upon simultaneously as it
may be biting more than that can be chewed. For instance, in talent management
area, attrition, employee satisfaction, development of people and succession
planning can be areas to consider. They all may be related but the source could
be one or two. Defining of the problem statement accurately will help in
bringing the correct focus while targeting the areas.
Measure: Performance
measure for the parameter needs to be defined correctly to ensure the right
tracking of data. The defining of measure also ensures consistency of measure
over a period of time. For instance, an organization may select to target
attrition and define it as voluntary attrition over an employee base. The other
definition can be overall attrition over employee base. Both the definitions
are accurate and organization can adapt one as per the need but they need to be
consistent over a considerable period to track the changes.
Analyze: After
defining the problem and how/ what to measure, it is important for HR to do
industry benchmarking of the parameter and set the standard for itself. Setting
the standard for self can be dependent on lot of other areas apart from
industry benchmark. An organization having compensation bracket much higher to
others in the market would like to see a better standard than industry
benchmark for attrition. The organization is incurring extra salary cost and hence
would like to see greater returns compared to peer organizations. Apart from
setting up the performance goals, this step shall also identify sources of
variation.
Improve: After
identification of parameter, process, standard and measure, the job ahead of HR
is to improve the score by taking certain measures around people and process
practices. The intervention has to be definite, time bound and target driven. A
vague improvement plan without target and timeline may not give us the required
result. Accurate design of operating limits and interdependency of variables
shall be considered while making any improvement plans.
Control: No race
is won till finish line is crossed. A good start if not sustained, will never
give organization the desired result. Most of the HR initiatives die as they
are unable to give long term sustenance to their ideas. HR shall do any course correction if required
to ensure that defined end results and timeline remain unaltered.
Some of the
metrics for different function can be as below,
Talent
Acquisition
It is important for
talent acquisition to show the return of their initiatives and team structure.
Recruitment system, use of placement consultants or any other sourcing channel
and resources are cost for recruitment. Some of the desirable outputs for
recruitment to showcase can be
- Turnaround time
- Cost per hire over a period of time
- Breakeven period for capital investments
Talent
Management
Any step taken by talent management team can mean huge financial impact depending on the population of the business unit. Fairness and differentiation needs to be carefully balanced for the desired output which is engaged and efficient workforce.Some of the measures for talent management team can be
- Attrition- critical and otherwise
- ESAT
- Average tenure
- Performance data
- Percentage of open position closed through internal movements (horizontal as well as vertical)
Leadership and
Development
Leadership and development is important function of HR and is responsible for development and capability of employees in the organization. This function is not in visible action on a daily basis and hence for this function it might be difficult to prove it's worth. A permanent capability building team as well as external trainers, both are sizable cost. To give a proper return, the function can measure some of the below parameters
- People out of eligible population being promoted to next level
- People having concerns about training
- Number of vacancies at senior leadership filled internally
Compensation and Benefits
This team has lot of competitive benchmarking to do. The team while defining the compensation plan has to ensure that company gets the benefit of incurred cost. The success measure can be
- Attrition due to compensation and to competition
- Mix of long term and short term incentive
- Differentiating package or component introduced
Shared Services
Shared services have lot of supporting roles to all the other functions of HR. Any lapse from their end can impact the effectiveness of other areas and overall cost for the organization.
- Lapse in background verification
- Lapse in salary processing like PF, gratuity, ESIC etc.
Sample Scorecard
|
Function
|
Parameter
|
Description
|
Industry standard
|
Target
|
Actual achieved
|
Score out of 10
|
Weightage %
|
Weighted Score
|
Trend / Change from last period
|
|
Talent Acquisition
|
Turn around time
|
Average time to close a
position
|
45 days
|
30 days
|
39
|
7
|
10%
|
0.7
|
Up
|
|
Talent Acquisition
|
Cost per hire
|
Total expenses/ number of
hires
|
INR 3000
|
INR 3000
|
INR 2000
|
10
|
15%
|
1.5
|
Up
|
|
Talent Acquisition
|
Percentage sourcing
through referral
|
Profiles hred through
internal reference/ Total no. of hires
|
40%
|
40%
|
33%
|
10
|
8%
|
0.8
|
Up
|
|
Talent Management
|
Infant attrition
|
No. of people leaving in
first 90 days/ total no. of hires during the period
|
<5%
|
5%
|
9%
|
6
|
8%
|
0.48
|
Down
|
|
Talent Management
|
Critical Attrition
|
No. of people with
ratings 1/ No. of employees in rating 1
|
<5%
|
<5%
|
7%
|
7
|
15%
|
1.05
|
Down
|
|
Talent Management
|
ESAT
|
Score as per survey
|
4
|
4.2
|
4
|
9
|
8%
|
0.72
|
Up
|
|
Leadership and
development
|
Leadership position
filled internally
|
Positions filled
internally above a certain level
|
NA
|
4 No
|
2
|
5
|
10%
|
0.5
|
Down
|
|
Leadership and
development
|
Number of training
mandays per employee
|
No. of people attending
the no. of days of training/ total no. of employees
|
4
|
6
|
3
|
5
|
10%
|
0.5
|
Up
|
|
Shared services
|
Payrolling
|
Errors in payroll
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
8
|
10%
|
0.8
|
Same
|
|
Shared services
|
Non compliance
|
Adherence to required
norms
|
0 Non compliance
|
0
|
1
|
7
|
6%
|
0.42
|
Same
|
|
|
100%
|
7.47
|
|
||||||
Problems vary
with organization lifecycle
We cannot use
same scorecard for every organization. As an organization grows and the
competitive space changes for the organization, the parameters and measure of
the scorecard has to change accordingly. A young organization may focus more on
parameters like talent acquisition while a matured organization’s focus area
can be development of individuals and creation of brand value for the
organization. Change of competitive space can also lead to change in approach.
A sudden spring up of competitors may force organization to have attrition as
focus area. In an industry which highly research oriented, creation of intellectual
property can be critical component of scorecard. The scorecard needs constant
customization as the situation for organization changes, both internally and
externally.
Conclusion
We need to
understand that not every problem can be solved. We need to prioritize the problem
areas and act. Some of the problems may be miniscule in impact but will require
a lot of effort to bring in the required change. Hence, it is important to prioritize
not only in terms of impact but also to segregate the low hanging fruits from
far-fetched dreams. Hence scorecard should be impactful and precise instead of
laundry list. Most of the times organizations make the mistake of putting lot of
action items in the scorecard and thus as a result, the impact attached to any
parameter has to be reduced to accommodate more line items. If the number of
factors remain finite, realistic and impactful, due impact number can be accordingly
attached.
No comments:
Post a Comment